RE: Can someone help me understand this potential finding and what it implies?
May 5, 2018 at 3:30 pm
(May 5, 2018 at 1:33 pm)Hammy Wrote:(May 5, 2018 at 3:00 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: It implies the author is an idiot, which can be deduced before you even get to the first period, right after “.....as they violate the law of conservation, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed”
He happens to be right about pure energy being unable to be created or destroyed though. I haven't read any of the article.
Matter, anti-matter, dark matter... and whatever matter is made of... all consists ultimately of some form of quantum energy, in a very broad sense (as opposed to the disgustingly New-Agey sense). There isn't really anywhere that you can find non-stuff... for starters non-stuff is precisely not something that you can find lol.
It is the “violated” part, nor the “stated” part of the first sentence that makes clear the author is an idiot.
