DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

You guys can try to dance around the argument all you want but the questions remain the same.  You can't even begin to explain where the information bearing properties of DNA come from.  Everything you come up with is a joke and not scientific.

The only person who dancing is you . All your arguments have been refuted or rendered irrelevant. Your a pusher of pseudoscience and little else.

---

T

he complexity and specificity allow us to infer design.  When I look at a car or a building, I infer design based on it's specified complexity.  Don't twist my worst like child's play antagonistic debating.  I said the entire universe is designed which is why even a dumb rock requires design here; however, the proof of design is in the complex and specific examples like DNA.

Mindlessly repeating the long refuted design inference(which isn't a real thing it's pseudoscience) will get you no were . Oh and again argument from ignorance.

---

OMG now he's even copy pasting examples of "design" from ID websites . The mount Rushmore example has already been refuted 

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/dow...1&type=pdf

http://infophilia.blogspot.ca/2007/04/if...u-sue.html

https://ncse.com/library-resource/michae...blic-radio

---

I'm convinced this guys a parrot . Hell wasn't even able to see Richard Carriers utter devastation of the Central themes of ID because he didn't find the word DNA in a random search 
Seriously