DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Mister Agenda]

If we can produce a natural explanation, does god then suddenly vanish?

No, but there is no way to provide a natural explanation to highly sophisticated code in DNA.

Criminy, at least read the Wikipedia article on abiogenesis before you spout crap like that.

---

Lol no explanation  you will except 

Because your ID pseudoscience talking heads say it can't be so 

No, because logic says it can't be so.

Good, please put the logic in the form of a syllogism so it can be analyzed. If you have logic, you should really try using it instead of just going 'It's obvious!'.

---

Sigh no it doesn't 

Do you have a background in science, engineering, mathematics, statistics?

The foremost experts in the fields most concerned with evolutionary biology do.

---

That's of no concern

Well it is because you make a lot of claims regarding those fields.

Because you wouldn't make claims regarding the fields in biology without having the proper background, eh?

---

Lol again you miss the point 

I skimmed it.  I am looking for a paper that answers my 4 questions or at least tries to address it.  These papers don't even come close.  I glanced at this one and it looks like more non-sensible propaganda.  The information in DNA is the key.  There is no explanation for it outside of design.

Do you know what an argument from ignorance is and why it's a fallacy?

---

I reject your hypothesis and nothing you say will change my mind. Why do you persist in the folly? Are you that ignorant and deluded?

Just responding to as many posts as I can.

You don't have to respond to every post made. The most intellectually honest thing to do is to focus on the ones that make the best points.

---

The scientist (Kenyon) who came up with the Biochemical Predestination Theory found his theory impossible after breakthroughs in DNA became apparent.  Experiments showed that amino acids do not have the capability to order themselves into a biological meaningful sequence.  The origin of genetic information caused Kenyon to reassess his biochemical predestination position regarding origins.  Kenyon then went out looking for the source of the biological information in DNA.  Kenyon realized he faced a narrowing set of options.  By the 1970’s most researchers rejected the idea that the information necessary to build the first cells originated by chance alone.

No scientist who accepts abiogenesis is the most likely explanation for the origin of life thinks the first cell originated by chance alone. The first replicating molecule would have arisen by chance, and natural selection would have acted on it thereafter.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2...eplicator/

---

Things are either designed or not.  DNA proves they are designed.  That's my point.

If you had proven that DNA was designed, then you would have a point. But you haven't, so you don't.

---

I provided proof.  That pretty much ended the debate.

What is it with people like you and Mystic Knight who think they just get to declare victory? Victory in a debate is convincing someone who was initially skeptical that you are correct. You haven't done that. I suspect anyone on the fence who ever reads this thread will be less likely to think DNA is designed after hearing what you consider proof for that than they would if you had never said a word.