DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Mister Agenda]

You done with that high horse now? Our groom would like to brush him down and get him fed.

There is a difference from this site to almost every other site I have ever been on, and it's not good. This is my observation: It is a forum of a bunch people who on average as a group score the lowest in agreeableness from the Big 5 trait that I think I have ever seen.

Antagonistic is the word I would use to describe the people here.

If you don't appreciate someone's comments, you can put them on ignore. That way you can set the standard for what sorts of responses you're subjected to.

---

And it's fantasy delusion for the win!

No, atheism hasn't won this debate.

You're not debating with atheism. You're debating with biology. Hundreds of millions of Christians and hundreds of millions of other theists accept a natural origin for life. It's fundamentalists, mostly Christian and Muslim fundamentalists, who hang their hope of salvation on intelligent design.

---

A highly sophisticated digital code was found in DNA.  It's designed by a Designer.

See, if you were actually using logic, there would be a part that shows sophisticated information requires a conscious designer between that premise and that conclusion. And it would be in a form that doesn't assume its conclusion.

---

Specified and complex highly sophisticated digital code is in DNA.  It is designed.  If I saw Mount Rushmore I would know it too was designed.  We infer designed based on both specificity and complexity.

I can prove Mount Rushmore was designed. Archeologically from the tool marks, and from photographs taken as it was being carved. If you showed me a rock formation that appeared to be designed, and there are many such, I could use archaeological techniques to confirm or falsify that initial assumption. A formation that looks like Mount Rushmore due simply to weathering is possible, it's just unlikely. If I found it out of context, I should investigate rather than assume I've already got it figured out, right?

You've got nothing like the evidence that Rushmore was carved by humans for the origin of DNA.

---

You guys can try to dance around the argument all you want but the questions remain the same.  You can't even begin to explain where the information bearing properties of DNA come from.  Everything you come up with is a joke and not scientific.

We tried science on you, but it doesn't seem to have any effect. What's left but amusement?