RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 8, 2018 at 5:49 pm
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2018 at 6:51 pm by possibletarian.)
(May 8, 2018 at 4:53 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(May 8, 2018 at 4:46 pm)Kit Wrote: I certainly don't copy and paste arguments I've made in the past.
If you have taken the time to write something well, I don't see anything wrong with this. Of course I would agree that this would be the start of a conversation, and not a replacement for conversation and interaction with others.
I have a few things like this, that I have saved; but, wish I had the discipline to do it more.
Actually, I need to come up with a system to save and tag references to things. Far too often, I find myself researching things all over again.
I don't see anything wrong with a cut and paste, after all we do it all the time when quoting from other sites.
But likewise it should be the start of a debate, or alternatively explain that its your own work from a few years ago.
(May 8, 2018 at 5:06 pm)CDF47 Wrote: So respond to the post rather than discussing your google search of it.
You can come with your army of troll posters and post all the nonsense straw-man arguments and ridicule you like. However, your tricks can't stand up to the truth that DNA and the universe are designed.
Here is a cut and paste from responses two years ago (look familiar ? )
Quote:Did you just respond to my response by copy-pasting your original post? ><
Quote:Christian scientists: gee, this is complicated, throw it in the "God made it" pile
Quote:You keep saying its clear. Why is there not a consensus among experts in the field?
all from the following thread. (interesting read for anyone interested.)
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/bispin...755/page-3
And this is our problem, We have three big problems here, just as the posters did a few years ago.
1) You have not addressed the refutations.
2) You cannot show any scientific consensus in your favour, despite saying 'the fact', we have to ask who's fact ?
3) You keep just repeating your assertions and throwing god into every 'we don't know' science comes across, an unanswered question is just that no god required (unless you can prove a god did it of course)
Maybe if you carefully answer some of the questions put before you ?
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'