DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

Keep trying to mimic Dawkins like his puppet.

Not mimicing Dawkins Mr Inquisition.  Just stating bald fact.

When you adopt the position of "I'm too incurious to examine the evidence, therefore goddidit", you have to expect that reasonable people will laugh at you.  Because there's no other sane option than derision and ridicule.

Pretty much when all the smoke and mirrors of ID newspeak is stripped away what response is their other then ridicule .As it is the only reasonable response .

And it's ironic that the man who essentially does nothing but brainlessly repeat ID propaganda and does a poor man's impression Meyers has the balls to say we don't think for ourselves or are puppets.

. when it comes to explaining the Cambrian explosion, Darwin's Doubt is compromised by Meyer's lack of scientific knowledge, his "god of the gaps" approach, and selective scholarship that appears driven by his deep belief in an explicit role of an intelligent designer in the history of life.

Review of Meyers book Darwin's Doubt  in magazine Science