RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 10, 2018 at 5:48 am
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 5:54 am by Pat Mustard.)
(May 9, 2018 at 5:41 pm)possibletarian Wrote:(May 9, 2018 at 4:15 pm)CDF47 Wrote: There is absolutely no doubt it is designed, 100 percent for sure. It is like seeing a 747 jumbo jet and saying I wonder if someone designed and built that or if a tornado dropped it here. Although DNA is way more complex and specific than a 747 jumbo jet. I was just using that as an analogy.
Quote:There is absolutely no doubt it is designed,
Actually there is, with the scientists who are best qualified to asses these things.
Quote:It is like seeing a 747 jumbo jet and saying I wonder if someone designed and built that or if a tornado dropped it here.
Actually i have never heard anyone say that, they know it's designed. They don't claim that a designer put instructions in the molecules of the plane to construct itself, it not being a living organism, i find such comparisons childish and stupid and a terrible analogy.
Quote:Although DNA is way more complex and specific than a 747 jumbo jet. I was just using that as an analogy.
Complexity does not mean design, it simply means complex.
(May 9, 2018 at 4:58 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: 72 pages of mindless waffle and responses?
We need whipped cream.
Stat!
It always comes to some kind of whipping with you
I see Mr Inquisition is so stupid he managed to butcher Hoyle's useless 747 argument.
(May 9, 2018 at 9:29 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 9, 2018 at 4:31 pm)Wololo Wrote: Be honest Mr Inquisition, you've studied the crack of my arse more seriously than you've studied any aspect of biology.
If you even made the most cursory examination of the evidence available you'd accept that evolution is true and that the Modern Synthesis is the best model of explanation we have, and a very accurate and predictive one at that.
Creatardism neither explains the current status, fits the available evidence nor can be used to make a prediction about either missing evidence or possible future directions, mainly because it does not seek to describe reality but to try and fit, bend and misshape reality into a straitjacket.
PS I'm also guessing Mr Inquisition has no job, no friends and no activities which take him out of his mother's basement. Otherwise why would he be parked on this thread 24/7?
I said I believe micro-evolution is true. I believe in change over time. I already said that so stop the spin.
.
If "micro" evolution is true, then evolution is true in its entirity, Mr Inquisition. Because your idiotic distinction between micro and macro throws up a false break in a single process. Evolution is simply a series of small changes of an organism over time as dictated in changes to the organism's environment and bounded by the limits imposed by natural selection. Both "micro" and "macro" are this.
(May 10, 2018 at 3:03 am)Joods Wrote:(May 9, 2018 at 5:37 pm)CDF47 Wrote: No, it is just engineers know and understand design better than anyone.
Way to insult every medical specialist and scientific researcher who has ever done extensive work with DNA and has easily proven your silly argument false. Now you're just trolling. Intentionally being obtuse and willfully refusing to even listen to what's being offered to you in this thread.
Quote:When we see a code which is transported into an assembly line where various parts are placed together depending on the sequence of the code which then determines the component made which is then transported and formed into its functional shape which is then transported to a cell to perform its function, we as engineers see design and manufacturing which we work with and study ostensibly.
Longest. Run on. Sentence. Ever. Get a hobby dude. It's clear that accurate knowledge in DNA is not in your wheelhouse. Live beings are not developed in some warehouse, on some assembly line just because you seem to think that DNA is designed. Ya got a bad batch of crack there, buddy.
Quote:It is obviously designed and it is at a nano-scale and more specific and complex then we can dream. There is really nothing to argue here, DNA is designed.
For the 80 bazillionth time, NO it isn't. And you have clearly and repeatedly FAILED to represent any merits to your argument, successfully. Repeating your beliefs doesn't make them true. It simply means you are a broken record with no means of moving any discussion forward.
Trollers gonna troll, troll, troll, troll.
Frankly, I reckon Mr Inquisition is lying about his engineering knowledge too.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home