CDF47 Wrote:No, it is just engineers know and understand design better than anyone. When we see a code which is transported into an assembly line where various parts are placed together depending on the sequence of the code which then determines the component made which is then transported and formed into its functional shape which is then transported to a cell to perform its function, we as engineers see design and manufacturing which we work with and study ostensibly. It is obviously designed and it is at a nano-scale and more specific and complex then we can dream. There is really nothing to argue here, DNA is designed.
The bias of some engineers to perceive design has been previously noted. Fortunately, science has ways of accounting for bias so we can find what is actually the case when engineers arrogantly presuming to know better than specialists in the field guess wrong. Your claim falls apart if there is a natural explanation for the existence of DNA, and there is. RNA world may still turn out not to be the actual case, it's hard to test a hypothesis with evidence hundreds of millions of years old; but the hypothesis exists and the chemistry and math work; proving that an intelligent designer is not the only possible explanation, and that the evidence we do have supports abiogenesis, though not conclusively.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.