RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 10, 2018 at 6:11 pm
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2018 at 6:14 pm by CDF47.)
(May 10, 2018 at 12:29 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(May 10, 2018 at 12:26 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I am not talking about the rock. Rocks are not specified and complex. I am talking about sophisticated systems like DNA, the human body,... The only reason rocks are designed is because the entire universe is designed.
The design of a rock or of dna is not the same as the design of a 747. Again, I;m asking you why you think that you're more like a 747 than rocks or dna.
It's an analogy. Please do more study before responding with posts like this.
(May 10, 2018 at 2:00 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:ID and theology are separate topics although ID has religious implications as I have stated prior.
Bullshit.
The court in Kitzmiller v Dover found otherwise.
Quote:4.
Whether ID is Science
After a searching review of the record and applicable caselaw, we find that
while ID arguments may be true, a proposition on which the Court takes no
position, ID is not science. We find that ID fails on three different levels, any one
of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science. They are: (1)
ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting
supernatural causation; (2) the argument of irreducible complexity, central to ID,
employs the same flawed and illogical contrived dualism that doomed creation
science in the 1980's; and (3) ID’s negative attacks on evolution have been refuted
by the scientific community. As we will discuss in more detail below, it is
additionally important to note that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific
community, it has not generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the
subject of testing and research.
Go peddle your theology elsewhere. We are on to you. And so is the court.
Scientists determine scientific matters, not lawyers and judges.
(May 10, 2018 at 2:33 pm)Hammy Wrote:(May 5, 2018 at 9:59 pm)CDF47 Wrote: You are so wrong on this one. Extremely sophisticated information was found in DNA. The debate is over.
What an incredibly poeish thing to say!
(May 5, 2018 at 10:22 pm)CDF47 Wrote: The scientific community disagrees with you. 51 percent of scientists are believers and 41 percent are non-believers based on a Pew poll result. Once the stigma of ID wears old, I expect that number to increase even more for believers. Also, 89 percent of people in the US believe in God based on a Gallup poll.
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scien...nd-belief/
http://news.gallup.com/poll/193271/ameri...e-god.aspx
Many believers accept evolution. Including 100% of Catholics. So the fact 51% are believers is irrelevant.
I accept micro-evolution as well.