(May 10, 2018 at 7:54 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 10, 2018 at 7:48 pm)Hammy Wrote: No it wasn't.
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"
The evidence I provided should be defined as proof.
Only in the way the a vague inage in the shape of a man's face appearing on toast is "proof".
And that's only by those willing to accept claims or are going to believe anyway.
The rest of us have a higher standard for evidence, let alone proof.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"