DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Mister Agenda]

I responded to over 200 posts in the last 100 plus pages.  Can you respond to this one?

You first posed these questions on this thread (obvious cut-and-paste devoid of your own thought, your own words, and un-sourced) in post number 444. It was answered in post 453, 462, and by me in post 666.

How many times do you expect people to respond to the same list of questions, and how many times do you plan to act like we don't have any responses for them? If you're a bot, that would explain pretty much everything about your posts.

---

You mean the ignorant things that inform your belief?

No, I mean those questions that have no natural explanation.

Even if you don't agree with the possible natural explanations; it's dishonest to pretend there aren't any.

---

-and rocks...........

Sure, if you think you can handle the universe too.  I got more questions about that.

What I'm hearing you say is the designer of the universe designs things with dumb Shannon information. Correct?

---

Only 3.1 percent of Americans are atheists according to a 2014 Pew research poll:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/201...-atheists/

I don't understand how in the 21st century any atheists can exist based on recent findings in science.

When asked if they believe in God, 9% of Americans say no. Not everyone who is an atheist identifies as one.

And argument ad populum is a fallacy. When there are more Muslims than Christians in the world, do you think that will make Islam correct? When there were more Hindus than Christians in the world, did that make them correct at the time?

---

Who cares?

Nobody cares about atheism is the point.  Only 3 percent.

Only 3.1% in the latest poll. It was 1.6% in the poll seven years before that. That's a 94% increase in seven years. If you don't care, don't blame us when you get blindsided.

---

No, you fuckin moron.


Better?

Just wanted to make sure you weren't one of those atheists that don't believe in God and don't like Him either which is ridiculous.  You were kind of coming off that way.

I don't believe in Voldemort and I think he's evil. How I feel about a god or God depends on how the writer portrays it.

---

The non existence of God is not dependent on how many atheists there are. The popularity or non popularity of a belief has
absolutely no bearing on how true it is. To suggest that it has is to commit a logical fallacy namely argumentum ad populum

I agree with that.  Was just pointing out it is not as popular as made to seem.

Who exactly was trying to make it seem popular? Creationism isn't popular among scientists who study DNA, who may or may not be atheists. A particularly famous genetic scientist is a Christian...but not a creationist.

---

It does not matter if it popular idiot .

Well, hardly anyone classifies themselves this way so it says at least that.  It is great to see people can still see through the BS arguments thrown out by atheists.

You mean the arguments thrown about by the most respected scientists in the relevant fields.

---

It does not matter if it's popular .Thus your  whole post is meaningless .

It is great to see people can still see through the BS arguments thrown out by atheists.

I thought this thread was supposed to be about DNA, Why did you change the subject of the thread you started?

---

That is a link about atheists not science and there is nothing in it suggesting
the existence of God from recent scientific findings as you have just claimed

I posted the science poll earlier in this thread.  This was to show a generalization.

The science poll that wasn't about how many scientists in relevant fields accept ID over abiogenesis?

---

DNA still doesn't prove existence of a designer; nice try, though.

It sure does.

See, when you assert something without supporting, no one has to give any justification at all for blowing it off. It's just, like, your opinion, man.

---

I've responded 250 times to posts in this thread.  That is plenty as far as I am concerned after 110 pages.

Yeah, but how many of them were things you hadn't already said or asked?

---

Do you have references to this?  Are there videos you can link to?

You know what's better than a linked video? The ability to cogently make your own points in your own words.

---

I brought scientific facts, I didn't call anyone names, and I supported my claims.

I already have proved it.

You brought nature videos about how wonderful and complex DNA is. You never proved that wonderful and complex requires a designer, which is the thing you're claiming. We all know DNA is just the cat's pajamas. Do more than assert want you want to prove.

Drich has been a poster here for years.
I've been a poster here for years. Therefore I'm Drich.

That's the kind of logic we all want you to do better than.