RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 13, 2018 at 2:02 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2018 at 2:06 pm by possibletarian.)
(May 13, 2018 at 1:07 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 13, 2018 at 10:01 am)possibletarian Wrote: Most scientists at one time were christians (at least nominally), they lived in a world dominated by christianity, they had to be to get an education.
However I find your ability to selectively miss use information staggering, why would belief in a higher power mean that people support I.D. nonsense, they simply don't, the scientific community you mention above simply does not support your faith based assumptions. In fact they oppose it. You quote a a single source from one of the most religious country's in the world, lets see what the very same organisation says about your precious I.D.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sc...ent_design
I also find it odd that you claim bias, and yet at the same time claim that the scientific community has a 'theistic' majority. There is a very good reason I.D. proponents are laughed at, because they are trying to include faith based assumptions into science.
Also many bodies are against the I.D. nonsense.
https://www.aclu.org/other/what-scientif...ent-design
Seriously, against what you say is irrefutable evidence, in a scientific community you say is dominated by people who believe in a higher power ? Many of them are based in a country where you claim only 3% are atheists at yet at the same time shout bias.
You really are at best a conspiracy nut
Watch the movie exposed. The scientific community systematically fights against ID. There are more scientists that believe in a higher power than there are atheist scientists as well in the US. Not every scientist is involved in the systemic battle against ID and some I am sure do even know what ID is. Many are not biochemists or biologists or cosmologists,...
I've already told you I have seen it and found it to be very poor, in fact worse than poor there has been several websites and articles from scientists showing you it's errors. In fact when it came out I was a Christian, even then i was embarrassed by its tactics.
There is no systematic battle against ID in science, it is simply not science, it belongs in the realms of faith.
When a whole association takes such a powerful a stance against your fantasy position (and it is certainly not the only one to do so), and that from a society you claim the majority are believers in some kind of ultimate being. And this after you are claiming irrefutable evidence.
You really are simply a conspiracy nut.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'