(May 13, 2018 at 3:43 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 13, 2018 at 3:30 pm)Kit Wrote:![]()
As I've already explained:
A good scientist can hold silly religious beliefs and still be good at his job so long as he keeps both separate, unless he's an ID scientist; at that point, he's just lost his way entirely.
There are brilliant scientists that are ID scientists.
You're not only a shithead, you're a liar, too. Keep heading further down the toilet.
https://www.aclu.org/other/what-scientif...ent-design
Quote:American Association of University Professors
"The theory of evolution is all but universally accepted in the community of scholars and has contributed immeasurably to our understanding of the natural world. [...] The American Association of University Professors deplores efforts in local communities and by some state legislators to require teachers in public schools to treat evolution as merely a hypothesis or speculation, untested and unsubstantiated by the methods of science, and to require them to make students aware of an "intelligent-design hypothesis" to account for the origins of life. These initiatives not only violate the academic freedom of public school teachers, but can deny students an understanding of the overwhelming scientific consensus regarding evolution."
Among numerous other citations.
There is no place for creatardism in science.