DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

Below is information on DNA spell checkers:

https://research.cornell.edu/news-featur...l-checkers

This is no fallacy.  You are living a lie.  You are in denial.

The fallacies weren't to do with the existence of 'spell checkers'. The fallacies were in the ways you drew conclusions from their existence. Would you please stop linking shit that shows how complicated DNA is? We all know it's complicated, and there isn't a magic degree of complication that will make us go 'you know what, he's right, it MUST have been designed, because only a designer could account for something being so complicated!' We think natural processes can account for it, just as they've accounted for everything else we've ever found the cause for. You say they can't because they're 'dumb', yet we know that what you call 'dumb natural processes' can result in high complexity, and in many cases we understand exactly how they do it. To prove that is not what's happening in this case as well, you need more than 'it's so complicated!'. You need to demonstrate what it is that keeps natural processes from developing something like DNA, given organic chemistry, simpler predecessors, the right conditions, and hundreds of millions of years.

You will not be able to prove that in a million years.  Going from dumb in-organic to super-sophisticated DNA is not going to happen.