CDF47 Wrote:Don't want to talk about DNA spell checkers? Is that to far down the design evidence for you?
Nope, they're not miraculously more compelling of acceptance of ID than other parts of DNA. It's a waste of time for you to keep linking amazing new factoids about DNA. That's not what will convince us. To have a chance of convincing us, you have to do better than this:
1. DNA is amazingly complex!
2. Nothing.
3. Therefore it must have been consciously designed!
The middle part is important. It's the part where you tell us WHY something being so complex means it must have been designed. Complexity isn't even a criteria for human design, almost everything we design is orders of magnitude less complex that what is found in nature.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.