RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
September 7, 2011 at 3:29 pm
(This post was last modified: September 7, 2011 at 3:31 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(September 7, 2011 at 3:22 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Easily explained ad hoc, easily handwaved, easily translated away. Rgr. Even easily ignored.
You guys always talk a good game but I have never seen an atheist present an actual logical contradiction (X and not X in the same relationship and at the same time) in the Bible. It's all just blowing smoke.
(September 7, 2011 at 3:28 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You've misrepresented my position.
Which would be more accurately described as "None of the above".
I accurately represented it as irrational. You cannot account for the preconditions of intelligibility given your position, yet you believe knowledge is possible so your position is false.