RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 14, 2018 at 8:19 pm
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2018 at 8:24 pm by CDF47.)
(May 14, 2018 at 8:14 pm)Joods Wrote:(May 14, 2018 at 8:12 pm)CDF47 Wrote: We are still, technically, a republic though. It is not just a play on words.
I'm willing to bet you didn't even bother reading the article. You just want to run your mouth.
I'm going to nickname you Mr. Diarrhea. It suits you because all you do is spew shit from your mouth.
I read the article and it's not technically correct:
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what...-have.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_go...ted_States
(May 14, 2018 at 8:16 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Who cares..are you here to crow about your moral superiority or do you think you have something accurate to say about evolutionary biology?
After what I found on here, both.
(May 14, 2018 at 8:18 pm)Joods Wrote:(May 14, 2018 at 8:14 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Then you show your moral level is low and you are below the maturity level of a 16 year old kid.
That's impressive. I was referring to the typical maturity level of a 16 year old. You as a mother should know what is expected by that.
I also have a 16 year old, a 22 year old and a 14 year old. They aren't at all and never were as immature as you are trying to make 16 year olds out to be.
Again - you have issues with generalizations. Clearly, correctly making them isn't in your wheelhouse. Perhaps you should learn what definitions to big words actually mean, prior to attempting to use them.
That is great you raised so many children that are mature. I am not sure what big words I messed up. Not trying to be rude.
(May 14, 2018 at 8:19 pm)Khemikal Wrote: No. Make a thread if you want to embarass yourself with qm. I'll let our board phycisists handle that.
I might actually do that. It is an interesting test.