(September 7, 2011 at 3:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Firstly, I don't have to prove your bible false, you have to prove it to be true. You know that. Secondly, whether your representation is rational appears very much to be your own opinion, as I have heard no reasonable argument from you whatsoever (and that's in the entire time I've been here).
Actually, since we're sharing, your interpretation of the bible makes ME want to defend christianity against you.
Again, just more smoke. I just assumed that when you guys assert that scripture contains logical contradictions you would actually demonstrate this, but alas I am disappointed again. I have already demonstrated that scripture can account for the preconditions of intelligibility. You have demonstrated that you believe knowledge is possible but you cannot account for the preconditions that make it possible given your worldview, so your worldview is irrational unless you can give account. The fact that the Christian worldview is the only worldview that could make knowledge possible is proof that it is true, so I have done what you asked me to do.
P1 If knowledge is possible, scripture is necessarily true
P2 Knowledge is possible
C1 Therefore scripture is necessarily true.
The above is a valid syllogism and I have demonstrated that both premises are in fact true; therefore the conclusion is also true. If you feel I have taken a misstep here please demonstrate how so or my argument stands un-refuted.
