RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 15, 2018 at 2:41 am
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2018 at 2:43 am by CDF47.)
(May 15, 2018 at 2:36 am)Khemikal Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 2:30 am)CDF47 Wrote: ID asks the hard questions. It discovers some great answers as well.Nope.
Quote:Accuracy is important.Good, then.. while you're entitled to your own beliefs..you aren;t entitled to your own facts. The information in dna comes from the environment.
Quote:"In The Origin of Species Darwin stated:-and the world (and this board) is still waiting for a simple example of such a thing. I think it;s a fools errand, and toppling modern synth wouldn;t advance the case for gods a single iota in any case.
'If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.'
It is too sophisticated to come from the dumb environment. It comes from advanced intelligence. Design is detectable.
The Type III Transport and the other machines I posted earlier.
(May 15, 2018 at 2:38 am)Mathilda Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 2:30 am)CDF47 Wrote: ID asks the hard questions. It discovers some great answers as well.
Accuracy is important.
This is why the thread has grown to 204 pages. You give the barest of replies. It means any insights are completely buried. Or any time that your world view gets pushed to breaking point, it's easier to forget about. Like why your god designs each snowflake when it would be easier to have them all the same.
You could have told us what hard questions ID asks. You could have told us of its great discoveries that you claim it has made. But you didn't. You just asserted in as few words as possible. If you had then you would have had a chance to convince us and we would have had a chance to evaluate your claim. You are just wasting everyone's time.
Because He likes a diversification in snow flakes.
No matter what I right you would fallibly try to refute.