RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 15, 2018 at 6:31 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2018 at 6:41 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(May 15, 2018 at 6:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Behe's arguments for irreducible complexity are solid and stand to this day.
It was never debunked.
It is too bad I haven't earned your respect but I would rather spread the truth. If stating facts is unpopular, so be it.
No, it is called co-option. They are each irreducibly complex machines.
Scientists have found no intermediary steps for irreducibly complex machines.
The machine is complex and specific and comes from a highly sophisticated and functional code.
No response.
No response.
No response.
Irreducible complexity does not even rise to the level of bunk. To qualify as bunk it must make unique testable prediction. It predicts nothing, and it solely expresses the opinion that it’s advocates are so stupid they can not even imagine how others can ever be not quite as stupid as they are.
