(May 15, 2018 at 6:31 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:He will claim behe's lame ass prediction . That never actually came true and was easily refuted or he will go back his fallacy of "you have not found i precursor i will accept therefore there isn't one". Pure fallacy .(May 15, 2018 at 6:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Behe's arguments for irreducible complexity are solid and stand to this day.
It was never debunked.
It is too bad I haven't earned your respect but I would rather spread the truth. If stating facts is unpopular, so be it.
No, it is called co-option. They are each irreducibly complex machines.
Scientists have found no intermediary steps for irreducibly complex machines.
The machine is complex and specific and comes from a highly sophisticated and functional code.
No response.
No response.
No response.
Irreducible complexity does not even rise to the level of bunk. To qualify as bunk it must make unique testable prediction. It predicts nothing, and it solely expresses the opinion that it’s advocates are so stupid they can even imagine how others can ever be not quite as stupid as they are.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb
