DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

He will claim behe's lame ass prediction . That never actually came true and was easily refuted or he will go back his fallacy of "you have not found i precursor i will accept therefore there isn't one". Pure fallacy .

A prediction of “you will never find” is no prediction at all unless one waits to the end of time.

A prediction is “this is what you will find”.  A unique prediction is “this is what you will find because....,and no one else will forecast this find because...”.

Fair enough.  You will never find a natural cause for the information in DNA, I predict.  Information always comes from an intelligence.

---

Dr. Meyer used the same scientific method as Darwin to show that intelligent design is the best argument for information in DNA, molecular machines,...  It is not just an assertion.

No he didn't and yes it nothing but an assertion . Meyers is a fraud.

Someone actually did say they weren't machines and the videos do show they are irreducibly complex.  You are just afraid to watch them because you will see your whole atheist worldview come crashing down in the face of the intricacy of the molecular machine.

Nope because the video's don't support your case . And there is no such thing as an atheist worldview .

I see nothing wrong with post 2059.

Yes there is it's wrong 

Design can be inferred.  See the following book on design inference by William Dembski: The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities (Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction and Decision Theory).

Dembski is a fraud and his probability argument has already been refuted by real scientists .There is no design inference .It's a crock of shit .

I am a believer so I am not spiritually blind.  That verse is for unbelievers.

Nop your just blind

You all just try to discredit the ID scientists, many of which are brighter than you.  It's a debate trick.  Dr. Meyer is a brilliant scientist.

Yes, they do.

No, it's not.

See my top response above.

No, you are.

---

It shows how the machines function.

It does not support your ID bollocks nor is nature  a legit science site a supporter of ID garbage in fact it's staunchly against ID in favour of REAL science .

Any source which posts ID will just be called an illegitimate source by you guys so it's pointless debate.  It's just a debate trick is all, even when numerous reputable sources are provided.

---

DNA contains information.  Information always comes from an intelligence.  DNA information is designed.

---

It shows how the machines function.

Information always come from intelligence?




So i am informed by the dumbest fuck i’ve ever encountered.

Intelligence is nothing more than information manipulating information.   Where did the original information that is supposedly your god come from?

Feelings are mutual.

God is the primordial One.  He is eternal.

---

DNA contains information.  

Even if true it proves nothing 

Information always comes from an intelligence.  

Assertion 

DNA information is designed.

Baseless conclusion

Disagree

---

A software engineer know it takes a programmer to write a code.

For a man made computer 

They see a code in DNA and know it didn't write itself.

 Baseless conclusion 

It's that intuitive.

And it sucks you can take man made objects then compare them to none made objects . Then conclude they have the same origin . That's classic non starter .

Exactly, using God's materials.

No, it's not.

No, it's not.