RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 15, 2018 at 7:09 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2018 at 7:11 pm by CDF47.)
(May 15, 2018 at 6:53 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 6:49 pm)CDF47 Wrote: A software engineer know it takes a programmer to write a code. They see a code in DNA and know it didn't write itself. It's that intuitive.
Intuition is wrong.
A software engineer has no background in chemistry to understand the scope of possible organic chemistry over hundreds of millions of years. He has no background in earth science to understand the conditions under which these organic chemistry operates. He has no conception of the order of magnitude of individual trials possible at molecular level on a stage the size of the earth.
A programmer who has some real exposure to actual science would understand how narrow the confines of a few artificially created languages and artificially created machines really are and how little that equips him to opine what is possible in the real world outside of his keyboard, and shut up.
He knows a code always comes from a programmer. It's that simple. This code just happens to be the most sophisticated in the universe. It is clearly designed.
(May 15, 2018 at 6:54 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:They can also be stimulated for sex, LOL.What's pleasurable is not always good . And are your seriously trying to compare the risk of cancer to sexual stimulation as a trade off
No, but males and females have the same body plan up to a certain point in the womb and that is why they are there.
(May 15, 2018 at 6:56 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:DisagreeThis is not an issue of agreement as it is not an issue of opinion . Your wrong plain and simple . You have no case .
Quote:No, ID is science.Nope never was . Never will be .
Disagree.
(May 15, 2018 at 6:57 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 6:56 pm)CDF47 Wrote: They predicted that what was considered 97% junk DNA to actually have a function and they were correct. It is now called non-coding DNA and it acts as the operating system. Over 85 percent of DNA is non-coding DNA and 3% is coding DNA.
Repeating bunk does not make it less bunk.
Just showing the facts again as it was brought up again.
(May 15, 2018 at 6:57 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:They predicted that what was considered 97% junk DNA to actually have a function and they were correct. It is now called non-coding DNA and it acts as the operating system. Over 85 percent of DNA is non-coding DNA and 3% is coding DNA.Already linked to a dozen articles refuting the creation crockery .
Didn't refute anything.
