RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 15, 2018 at 9:36 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2018 at 9:47 pm by CDF47.)
(May 15, 2018 at 7:33 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 7:19 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Precursors have not been found. The pump is a different 10 part system than the 40 part motor. They just share similar parts and are configured a like.
Even if that were true, it would still be a fallacious argument. You're quibbling about the terms of surrender after you've already lost the battle.
I didn't lose anything. You wish I did. Watch the video I posted covers this in great detail.
(May 15, 2018 at 7:34 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:DisagreeYour wrong no disagreement to be had .
Why irreducible complexity is flawed by conception and pseudoscience
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...udoscience
The expelled leaders guide ripped to pieces
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Expelled:_...%27s_Guide
Quote:Try this experiment if you ever find yourself talking to a proponent of ID. Say, "OK, for the sake of argument let's say evolution is wrong and let's forget about it. Now tell me how intelligent design works." Having tried this a few times myself, I am confident that you will be met with nothing but an awkward silence.Good one Amanda
—Amanda Gefter[
Watch my good friend and Biologist Fiona Robertson own someone very much like CD
And Kicking ID ass a little further up the totem pole .
Why ID information theory is bollocks. From a professor of computer science .
http://recursed.blogspot.ca/2009/10/step...heory.html
Neo-Darwinist propaganda. Where does the information in DNA come from?
(May 15, 2018 at 8:21 pm)Khemikal Wrote: The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo. It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.
It's because we are right.
(May 15, 2018 at 8:22 pm)Kit Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 8:21 pm)Khemikal Wrote: The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo. It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.
Ironically, they think the same about us.
Exactly.
(May 15, 2018 at 8:29 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 8:22 pm)Kit Wrote: Ironically, they think the same about us.
They have faith, which is to say the believe whatever they want to believe, which by definition means they can believe they are never wrong if they like.
We have reality, which is to say we test our beliefs against reality, and when found wanting, make corrections.
Even when wrong, we are righter than they can possibly comprehend.
LOL. Yeah right.
(May 15, 2018 at 8:37 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(May 15, 2018 at 7:17 pm)CDF47 Wrote: The peak was a 5 - 10 million years was the main part of it I meant. My typo trying to respond to all these posts.
I am curious. CDF acknowledges that the earth is 4.56 billion years old, and not all species have existed since time immemorial, and some were introduced onto the earth during the Cambrian explosion. But no “kind”, whatever that means, ever became another.
What happens when the new kind is introduced? Did a great hand with a hole through the wrist reach down holding a brace of different squealing trilobites and set them in the water?
Did a halo appear suddenly and a few befuddled trilobites with no memory of what they did in the morning come through?
Did god just mold clay into trilobites on some potter’s Wheel on the ocean floor?
Not sure how He chooses to add new information into the systems to have them created.
(May 15, 2018 at 8:54 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: No, really.
Behe??
Behe is an excellent scientist. You are just biased of your views against him.