RE: Questions for "Our Role(s) as Christians on Atheist Forums"
May 17, 2018 at 11:45 am
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2018 at 11:47 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(May 17, 2018 at 11:39 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(May 17, 2018 at 11:34 am)Hammy Wrote: Yes that is the position.
No, it is not my poistion. I don't expect Khem to care that it isn't my position. But considering how much you and I have talked regarding Khem's bullshit, I would expect you to.
But I don't understand what you think I am misrepresenting. Okay let me try and be very clear by answering the following questions:
(1) God could choose intervene to stop innocent children and animals being harmed by people at any time. Yes or no? (2) God chooses not to intervene because he has a plan that makes not intervening during such things worth it in the long run because there will be an overall 'net good'. Yes or no?
All I said what you were saying is what you had told me. That God must have a good reason for allowing it to happen rather than intervening to prevent it. I also mentioned how you said there will be a 'net good'. Which is a term you literally used yourself right there in the post. I can't fathom what you think I am supposedly misrepresenting. It's almost like you don't really like your own position. You appear to be the one obfuscating here. I can literally say what you said and you don't like to hear it. So can you please answer my two direct questions above that I put in bold?
And what part did I say that supposedly misrepresents your position?