RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 22, 2018 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2018 at 8:07 pm by CDF47.)
(May 22, 2018 at 12:27 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(May 22, 2018 at 12:09 pm)CDF47 Wrote: That sounds good to me, I am interested in discussing other topics on the forum. This one has just consumed so much of my time though.
Didn;t have to, could have been the shortest convo ever:
"Hi, I was led to believe that ID was super legit and proved god, what do you guys think?"
Nope, ID is a failed hypothesis and nothing to do with any god if any god exists.
"Well I;ll be damned, thanks for helping me out guys..I;ll go and sin no more!"
You;re welcome.
.................but nooooooooo, lol.
LOL, as if I could be persuaded that easy.
(May 22, 2018 at 1:15 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(May 22, 2018 at 12:27 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Didn;t have to, could have been the shortest convo ever:
"Hi, I was led to believe that ID was super legit and proved god, what do you guys think?"
Nope, ID is a failed hypothesis and nothing to do with any god if any god exists.
"Well I;ll be damned, thanks for helping me out guys..I;ll go and sin no more!"
You;re welcome.
.................but nooooooooo, lol.
In what way does ID qualify as a hypothesis? What does it predict that is both unique and falsifiable?
It predicted that junk DNA was not junk. It turns out it is like an operating system and is now defined as non-coding DNA.
Below is a concise and clear explanation of ID:
http://www.intelligentdesign.org/whatisid.php
