RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 24, 2018 at 5:45 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2018 at 6:13 pm by Mister Agenda.)
CDF47 Wrote:Non-coding DNA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-coding_DNA
[/li]
Did you read the part of that article that said this: "Estimates for the biologically functional fraction of our genome based on comparative genomics range between 8 and 15%"?
CDF47 Wrote:Tizheruk Wrote:Blogs by an actual scientist and expert on genetics and biochemistry.And a professor at the University Of Toronto .
One that calls ID scientists IDiots. The wiki article does a good job of explaining non-coding DNA.
And says: "Estimates for the biologically functional fraction of our genome based on comparative genomics range between 8 and 15%."
CDF47 Wrote:Tizheruk Wrote:1. No he's not he a smug prick who drips with condensation
2. Then why did you bring it up ? Oh yeah as a red herring against the guy who mops the floor with your ID bunkum on Junk DNA
Over 85 percent of DNA is non-coding DNA. 3 percent is coding. Junk DNA is an old myth.
This is not true. Non-coding DNA does not code for proteins, but it does other stuff that is biologically significant. 85% is the estimate of the percentage of the human genome that is biologically nonfunctional.
CDF47 Wrote:Khemikal Wrote:butt stuff
(seriously, though, sorcerors.................?)
Yes, sorcerors. People actually practice sorcery to this day.
Do you think they can do 'real' magic?
CDF47 Wrote:Khemikal Wrote:Sympathetic magic? Tasseography, astrology, astral projection, tarotology......totemic invocation?
No, but there are people that practice all that.
If they aren't actually doing real magic, who cares? People can practice anything.
CDF47 Wrote:Tizheruk Wrote:Nope according to REAL science and reason .
I posted real science.
Not that supported your contention that DNA was designed. Complex and designed aren't synonyms. 'Look how complex it is' isn't an argument for design. It just tells us that you think really complex things have to be designed. That's an opinion, not an argument, evidence, or proof. Everything that you posted that was scientifically accurate did not support the notion that someone designed DNA. And you never addressed RNA world, which explains how you get to DNA without a designer.
CDF47 Wrote:forget about the lurkers in this thread. Who knows if someone learned something new for the first time about DNA, proteins, the universe, the Lord,....
Where do Christians get the idea that they're going to run into someone who never head their schtick who speaks English?
CDF47 Wrote:Tizheruk Wrote:Nope . I BOW TO NO ONE and have no lord . Least of all a figment of your imagination .
You will see.
Nuh uh. You're going to the Hell of the Mountain of Knives. You will see.
CDF47 Wrote:I haven't threatened anyone. Just spoke the truth throughout this thread but people hear would rather believe the lie.
"The Mafia Don I work for will gut your kids if you don't pay your protection money. But I'm not threatening you. Just speaking the truth."
-Anonymous Guido
CDF47 Wrote:I am not saying it to threaten but to inform.
Dude, repeating yourself is not informative.
CDF47 Wrote:Yeah, yeah, you guys know it all. I've heard that script before. You are blinded by your own arrogance.
So, what did you tell us that you think we didn't already know. Bearing in mind that almost all of us took biology in high school and have been preached at before.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.