DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

That would be good.  They can't prove you wrong since there is functional digital information in DNA and they know it.

No it would not .As there is nothing you knobs could say in debate that you have not already said on this forum already . Your whole case is built on fallacies and lies as has been exposed . So there is nothing to debate or disprove . You have no rational case the requires either .

---

What is a one-on-one debate supposed to accomplish? Have you been saving up evidence that you won't talk about on open forum?

Easy. A one-on-one debate is simply a facile attempt to whittle the opposition down. It is a tacit acknowledgement that his argument is so weak that his "truth" is so weak that it cannot stand any critical examination.

It is a common apologist tactic.

Yup along with Gish's Gallop and The give me one piece argument .

---

There is probably an unknown reason for the detour like all the other fallacy design issues.  Plus, we are intended to be flawed, decay, and die.  That is part of the fall.

Ad Hoc bullocks

---

Yes, it definitely does.

No it does not remotely . You have no case only bad reasoning .