DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

I read some of the articles you posted. 

No you did not . Had you you would still be push ID's genetic case . Because it destroys it .

They cannot dispute that there is information in DNA like you try to do.  

They utterly destroy ID's genetic case and thus yours . 

You won't even answer the first of a series of questions I had for you.

Because i already know were your going with this line of reasoning . It's not original and it ends in fallacy . So why should i answer it when i already know the outcome of the questions and why it's logically a non starter .