(June 2, 2018 at 1:00 am)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:I read some of the articles you posted.No you did not . Had you you would still be push ID's genetic case . Because it destroys it .
Quote:They cannot dispute that there is information in DNA like you try to do.They utterly destroy ID's genetic case and thus yours .
Quote:You won't even answer the first of a series of questions I had for you.Because i already know were your going with this line of reasoning . It's not original and it ends in fallacy . So why should i answer it when i already know the outcome of the questions and why it's logically a non starter .
It is perfectly logical to start with a step by step questioning. It is a start.