Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 20, 2025, 6:42 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 6, 2018 at 3:55 pm)Khemikal Wrote: "Going someplace else" is a choice that a person can make..except when they can;t...but that doesn;t take the place of civil rights, nor can it.

No one was forcing the couple to go there and in the state of Colorado, I think it's safe to say there's more than one baker in existence. I also didn't say it takes the place of civil rights. However, cake isn't a necessity or a need. It's a want and when a wedding cake is something that has to get made based on an individual's or a couple's preferences, then they are relying on the talents of the person making the cake. That person isn't mass producing the cake. They are making a one of a kind piece to be used at a single event. It is my opinion that the wedding cake is edible art. Those making it have the right not to feel pressured into making something they don't agree with.

And again, the wedding cake is a want, not a necessity. I don't really see civil rights being trounced on. If was working at a hospital and refused to provide medical attention to gay people or black people, that would be a violation of civil rights.

This is a slippery issue for me because I see both sides of the issue. Clearly I'm in the minority on this issue and I'm okay with that. And before anyone accuses me - I am not a bigot and I am not hating on any group of people. I asked my son for his opinion because he is gay and I felt that this was something we should talk about. He understands the importance of being able to know the difference between when his civil rights are being violated and when they are not.

At the end of the day, with regards to the issue of the baker, he feels that it's not worth it to force someone to do something they don't want to do. And I agree with him. The baker owns his own business and is not a non-profit agency. The only thing that he feels he shouldn't have to do is make wedding cakes for gay couples. He is more than willing to sell anything else he makes to them. He's not kicking them out of his store and refusing total service, just wedding cakes.

Would it have made everyone feel better if the baker had simply said that he was too busy? If so, why should he have to lie so that others aren't offended?
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by Joods - June 6, 2018 at 4:36 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1569 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 34282 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 514 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 5347 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 716 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1625 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 2273 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 40032 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1710 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 13960 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)