Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 21, 2025, 3:36 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
Actually - If I choose to spend $250,000 opening up a salon, I have the right to offer services of my choosing. Just because I went to school and learned how to do hair, skin and nails doesn't mean that I have to provide all of the services that I was trained to do. 

I had a bad experience in school - that I wrote about here once. A mother routinely brought her 8 year old in to get a relaxer because the mother was too lazy to actually do the child's hair. The child has ethnic hair, commonly referred to as black hair. It is very course and curly and thick. Getting to the scalp is damned near impossible. Anyway - as a student, I had to put a relaxer in the child's hair. For two hours that kid screamed and cried, wouldn't sit still and grandmother made things worse by trying to get involved. I went to my instructor with three fellow students and told her I was leaving if she did not get the client and her family under control and reschedule the service with someone else. 

Long story short - do I know how to do relaxers? Yes. Will I do them? Fuck no. Not after that experience. I also know how to do manicures and pedicures and facials. Does it mean that I have to do them? Not unless I choose to work at a salon where I am actually being hired to perform those services. Oh and none of that has fuck all to do with religious beliefs. Still not discriminatory for me to refuse the service. 

Conversely, if I open a salon, I get to choose which services I want to offer.  Advertised or not. If someone comes in wanting a relaxer, I don't have to provide that service. Period. I am not required to carry products needed to perform certain services unless I plan on offering those services. In addition - if someone comes in and wants their hair to go from a natural level of 2, which is the closest thing to black, to a 12, which is ultra platinum, and they want it done in one visit - I can refuse to do the service. Why? Because over processing a person's hair will cause it to fall out. Even after I have explained that - if they still want the service, I have the right to refuse to do it. Even if they want to sign a waiver. I can still refuse the service. Why? Because my license cost me $18,000 and I'll be damned if someone is going to cost me my license because they want what is physically impossible to do in one day. And that is not discrimination.

As a licensed professional, I also have the right to refuse service to anyone whom I feel might cause a health hazard to my place of employment. Technically, if you have dandruff and you go to get your haircut, did you know that you can be refused service because dandruff is contagious? Yes. It is contagious and legally, you can't get your service performed until you deal with it. And that is not discrimination.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by Joods - June 6, 2018 at 6:40 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1482 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 32277 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 476 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 4877 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 676 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1479 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 2074 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 37904 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1623 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 13155 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)