DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

The system makes a 747 jumbo jet look like child's play. Have you ever seen a 747 construct itself?

Hoyle's fallacy

I get the feeling that you are stretching it deep to try to get me to talk in circles.  There is a mind even behind a paper airplane and computers,....  Computers themselves due not have a mind.

Considering you accept ID we don't  trust your feelings 

No, I see a lot of spin and confusing irrational mumbo jumbo.

No that what we see every time you comment . Again you believe ID we don't trust your rationality .Rational on the other hand can see Khems point clear as day and accept it .

---

---

I get the feeling that you are stretching it deep to try to get me to talk in circles.  There is a mind even behind a paper airplane and computers,....  Computers themselves due not have a mind.

I don;t actually have to goad you into doing that.  You;re more than willing to volunteer the service.  I;ve actually tried to help you avoid it...but....you insist, lol.

"There must be a mind behind the thing I think is indicative of a mind or else it couldn;t have created the thing that I;m sure comes from minds!"

Not only are you wrong..that's a loop within a loop.  I -agree-...computers don;t have minds..but they do produce the thing you said was indicative of a mind...so thats that.  It;s done.  It;s over.  The thing you pointed to doesn;t even suggest or imply a mind, let alone necessitate one.  That;s just your sloppy thinking...and...you know what, maybe there is a mind behind it, but even if it were, that wouldn;t change the failure of the process at which you arrived at what could only be described as an accidentally accurate conclusion.

---

No, I see a lot of spin and confusing irrational mumbo jumbo.

I know that you;re confused...but all you have to do is ask and I;ll clear up whatever it is that's got you stumped.

Reality has him stumped. That's why he's a creationist .