Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 20, 2025, 4:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 6, 2018 at 6:43 pm)Khemikal Wrote:
(June 6, 2018 at 6:40 pm)Joods Wrote: Actually - If I choose to spend $250,000 opening up a salon, I have the right to offer services of my choosing. Just because I went to school and learned how to do hair, skin and nails doesn't mean that I have to provide all of the services that I was trained to do. 
You have no right to refuse a person on account of their gayness, no more so than the color of their skin..no matter how much money it costs you to start your salon.  That's totally irrelevant, as is the "art" business.

White people don't get relaxers. I don't do relaxers. So you're saying I have to stock my salon with relaxer chemicals on the off chance someone might come in and want one and that I have to give them one because they ask for it? Wrong. And if they want to claim discrimination, bring it. I wouldn't be stocking supplies for services I don't intend on performing regardless of someone's color or sexual orientation. So if a black person wants to rant and rave because I refuse to provide a service to them that I don't keep supplies for, they will lose. 

There are special types of salons that only deal with hair color. They do nothing else. You literally cannot go into those salons asking for services that they don't provide. Being gay or black, white, red, or purple has nothing to do with it. The fact that a gay person might get disgruntled because they don't get what they want at that place doesn't mean it's discrimination. Again - refer to my post about a person wanting to take their hair up ten levels in one session. Besides, if they are coming into my salon and I have no idea that they are gay, they can't very well claim discrimination on that basis, now can they? Not all gay people are out in the open with it nor are all gay people constantly flaunting the fact that they are gay.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker - by Joods - June 6, 2018 at 7:11 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1569 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 34269 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 514 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 5345 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 716 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1625 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 2272 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 40019 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1710 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 13958 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)