Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker

[A Theist]

What they did decide...

Words and words and words.  I;m sure that if you repeat them enough, they will somehow become true.  

If you want to talk about actual precedent, try this..

1968 Newman vs Piggie Park
The contention was that the civil rights act contravened the will of god. Therefore infringing on the right to free ex. The courts response?

"Patently frivolous."

This colorado baker case set no precedent and was specifically worded so that it did not do so, while simultaneously affirming -in- it;s decision that we no longer give bigots carte blanche to be bigots. It chastized a lower court for procedural missteps in it;s handling of the trial..but it did not affirm his or anyones right to discriminate.

Its the hate cake equivalent of the OJ verdict.

Fuck that cake and fuck the piggie park. The SCOTUS decision had nothing to do with either. You're just pissed off because the Supreme Court said that anti religious bigots in government agencies couldn't discriminate against a person's faith. It was more than just a procedural misstep by that state agency and the lower courts, otherwise you wouldn't be on your ass about it. They showed open hostility and bigotry toward the Baker because of his faith and the Supreme Court slapped them down for it....it affirmed that they didn't have the right to discriminate based on a person's faith. It's also funny just to watch you cry about it.