(June 14, 2018 at 10:59 am)CDF47 Wrote:(June 14, 2018 at 10:22 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Life is in every living cell in every organism that has living cells. Blood is not only not special in this regard, red blood cells do not contain the genome for the organism, unlike every other type of living cell in our bodies.
We already know DNA is complicated. We already know its operation is amazing. It's condescending for you to repeatedly talk like we're unaware of this, and disingenuous considering how many times you've already told us that, and how many times we've told you we get it.
However, we've an excellent idea of how natural processes can result in DNA, despite how complex and amazing it is, and what you keep failing provide is a reason to thing biologists are wrong about the likely pathway to first DNA formation.
I could forgive a 9th century Norse person for thinking lighting was caused by Thor, but at this point it's willful ignorance for a follower of Thor to claim that their god causes lightning because there are still some areas about lighting formation and behavior that we haven't pinned down yet. It's the 21st century and you worship a god that you apparently can't believe is competent enough to design a universe where DNA can form naturally on at least one planet out of the billions and billions scattered over billions and billions of galaxies.
The verse doesn't go into that much detail regarding life in the blood.
I was asked the same question again and the answer is the same! Scientists do not have a pathway for first DNA formation. It takes DNA to code for proteins and DNA is locked inside a protein. So what came first, the chicken or the egg. DNA is a miracle.
DNA can not form naturally in an infinite number of universes. The code did not write itself.
And as long as your argument is not simply that we do not have that knowledge, but based upon our ignorance, there cannot be such a pathway, then we will continue to point out that this is an argument from ignorance, so your conclusion doesn't follow from the premises. This has been pointed out to you time and again, but you seem to blithely ignore the fact that this argument does not in any sense prove design. If you have another argument besides, "Ehrmagherd DNA, therefore God," I'd be more than happy to listen. However if all you can do is simply repeat the same invalid argument, no matter how many times it's pointed out to you that it's invalid, then you are nothing but a willfully ignorant and obtuse clown.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)