(July 3, 2018 at 12:41 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(July 3, 2018 at 12:26 pm)Drich Wrote: what a weak willed single minded thing to say or do. If someone opens with something you do not like to you that person looses all credibility. no wonder your side of the election lost if your peers think as poorly as you do.
You are so intolerant you can not be bother to look at a simple paragraph as a whole and determine what is good or is bad. you look for things that allow to dismiss everything as a whole. how is that advanced thinking?
To me this is closed minded thinking as you will not allow yourself to be exposed to anything you do not already accept. how does that not raise an alarm in your mind? oh that's right you stopped reading 3 words in.
Addressing the content of your message:
Jesus you are either willfully the dumbest person on this website or this is simply the result of shutting down anything you don't want to hear for decades you just absorbe things that fit your narrative despite little things called evidence and provenance.
Because in truth the gospel of mark has been traced to 47 ADdid you see that you old goat? do you know what I just did? it took the conversation up a notch by taking my word and bndng to the work sited above who was published westminster john knox press.. which is indeed an authority on the matter like it or not..
- Perkins, Pheme (1998). "The Synoptic Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles: Telling the Christian Story". In Barton, John. The Cambridge companion to biblical interpretation. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 241–58. ISBN 978-0-521-48593-7.
Oddly enough, Wikipedia suggests that Mark "probably" dates to 66-70 AD, and they use the same work as a reference for that date. Where are you pulling the 47 AD date from, specifically?
Honestly can't find the otation. It was the number I always went to.. but did find this http://jesusalive.cc/ntsurveymark.htm
that puts us 55 to 68.. I might be thinking about luke contextual authorship. Meaning the argue authorship put luke past mark, but if you consider the events when luke and acts stop it puts the book of luke in the 40 ad window.
