(July 5, 2018 at 3:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(July 5, 2018 at 2:21 pm)Drich Wrote: I'll always side with what jesus says or is reported to say. fore there is always a "second" to support what is on the initial page. You may not see it but that is the wonderful thing I often do.. the challenged is to break it down so that you do to.
That doesn't actually answer the question. Was the reference legitimate prophecy or was Jesus just talking out of his ass?
lts prophecy as the bible tells it. again backed by several sources all of which had authorship dates prior to the destruction of the temple.
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/D...The-Temple
The authorship of these books (where Jesus is recorded making this same claim several times) were not ever contested till most recently. the evidence for such contestation? the temple and other prophesy remarks. If a book has an early date of 70ad it is because it mentions the temple. these books ranged from the 40'ad to the mid 60ad and now because the temple was mentioned all those books can't have been written before 70 ad. We know the Apostles saw their books to completion before their life time. for example peter and Paul died in 68 which means their work would have to had been recorded before then. but because of the prophesy mark and luke are considered post temple destruction.
