I'm 100% pro-choice.
Either:
A. A woman should NEVER have an abortion, meaning even when she's been raped, you are expecting a raped 13 year old girl to carry to term a full child.
or
B. It's okay to abort in cases of rape, in which case it's okay to punish the child for the actions of the father.
I don't see how one can remain logically consistent and be anti-abortion. One can be personally opposed to it (as in they would never get one for themselves), and one can even think that we need to reduce the number of abortions. But otherwise I don't see anyone remaining logically consistent and calling themselves 'pro-life'.
Either:
A. A woman should NEVER have an abortion, meaning even when she's been raped, you are expecting a raped 13 year old girl to carry to term a full child.
or
B. It's okay to abort in cases of rape, in which case it's okay to punish the child for the actions of the father.
I don't see how one can remain logically consistent and be anti-abortion. One can be personally opposed to it (as in they would never get one for themselves), and one can even think that we need to reduce the number of abortions. But otherwise I don't see anyone remaining logically consistent and calling themselves 'pro-life'.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
