RE: Should Hilary Run Next Election (The None Biased Version)
July 20, 2018 at 5:41 am
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2018 at 6:00 am by Brian37.)
(July 19, 2018 at 9:31 am)Tizheruk Wrote:(July 19, 2018 at 9:30 am)alpha male Wrote: Should be (The Misspelled Version).Still better than your poll . My poll doesn't insult the people answering it
(July 19, 2018 at 9:26 am)Brian37 Wrote: No and neither should Bernie.So who are you for ?
Don't know yet, but whomever we nominate for sure in the end.
My ideal candidate would be Michelle, but that wont happen. So, Warren, Biden, Duckworth.
(July 20, 2018 at 1:11 am)CapnAwesome Wrote:(July 19, 2018 at 12:32 pm)Alexmahone Wrote: Citations, please.
Well what I did was search the Hillary Clinton emails on WikiLeaks for reference to atheism and atheists. Aside from a shared email saying that Bernie Sanders can be attacked for being an atheist (which he isn't anyway) it's all a bunch of anti atheist mail mail forwarding. Suggesting a new faith adviser who is clearly hostile to atheists and the like.
As far as I know nobody has written a nice tidy article about it, but to me it seems razor clear. You can search the email database yourself on WikiLeaks.
Wiki and Anonymous are very dangerous. What people do not understand is that all political stripes are members/contributors of both. And those whom run it have no practical way to vet everyone who contributes, they are spy wannabes, not whistle blowers. It is bad enough that social media allows bigotry and anti western ideology to spread. Right now we have a very dangerous con man who is great at conning people, but has no fucking clue how global diplomacy works, and is giving our enemies every advantage.
Dems offered to make a bill promising not to use leaked info of the other, the GOP rejected the idea. That says to me, they are putting party above country. And then there is this.
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/07...urity.html
