A leopard can't change its spots.

[Autumnlicious]

You are correct in the first part. She is indeed inocent until proven guilty. My mistake. And yes again, the court will make a judgement about whether she did or not.

As far as I know, no one in this thread has made any statements contrary to the procedural actions of a court in rendering a decision on a case. So why do you have to keep stating it, bozo? Is it to somehow appeal to authority, authority of a UK court?

Ah, the UK. Where certain Sharia decisions are taken in lieu to full secular law under the pretenses of "tolerance". Where said pretenses dictate that someone allegedly placing a doll to hurt another's 'racial feelings' must endure trial for their 'toxic' views.

I only mention how well off they both are because it would not be surprising for a woman of that age and background ( shire woman not nouveau riche I am speculating ) to have racist tendencies. Again speculating, part of the problem may, stress, may, be their different backgrounds. The case may prove me right or wrong on these.

Who the fuck do you think you are to dictate who's personal views on anything, from faith to race to gravity to magic gnomes in the garden? What reprehensible mind-controlling garbage is this?

And once again, you make appeals to the courts authority. How mindless...

You obviously don't like the idea of punishment for race hate crimes, but that's your problem. The law does punish such crimes. So lighten up yourself to actual reality. If mrs. Mason had stoped to think about the possible implications for her actions ( if she did it ) then she took the risk and the risk bit her.

In the UK, it used to be that being gay meant sterilization, imprisonment and state-sanctioned harassment. Due to the arrogance of others like you who believed the "Law" is the end authority on such matters, it cost Britain their most famous computer scientist, Alan Turing. But then again, someone like you would've stated the following:

You obviously don't like the idea of punishment for buggery, but that's your problem. The law does punish such crimes. So lighten up yourself to actual reality. If mr. Turing had stoped to think about the possible implications for his actions ( if he did it ) then he took the risk and the risk bit him.

"I was just following orders" is no excuse, nor is "The Law says so".