(August 7, 2018 at 8:40 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(August 7, 2018 at 8:34 am)robvalue Wrote: And not to be disrespectful, but I imagine their quality of life and financial situations are generally considerably lower; and such people expect them not to do probably the most enjoyable and natural thing they have available, which is also free.
Yeah, it always comes back to that for me too. Why design sex to feel the way that it does in the first place if it’s going to lead to so many problems? Talk about setting people up to fail. Why not design sex to feel uncomfortable, like a trip to the dentist? That way only people who really want babies would be doing it, and god wouldn’t have to be upstairs suffering all this moral angst over our disobedience? Plus, way less AIDS.
I actually used to wonder the same when I was little. Well, little as in like in my very early teens.
Now a days I imagine sex feeling good is a result of evolution, and if it was uncomfortable, evolution would probably have happened very differently. Maybe our species wouldn't even exist today?
That would be my guess anyway. Hard for us to answer that question when we can't really see the whole picture, but trust me, I've thought it too.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
