(August 11, 2018 at 10:47 am)pocaracas Wrote:(August 11, 2018 at 10:38 am)SteveII Wrote: Two points here:
1. There is absolutely no physical or metaphysical reason to think they could not be different. The objection seems manufactured only for the purpose of this argument.
2. Postulating that the initial conditions had to be as they are leads to the question why was the cause of the universe so constrained? This is just kicking the can backwards. At some point you have to address the issues.
Your bias shows, when you ask a "why" question.
"Why" implies a reasoning entity behind an action.
Just because a question seems logical, doesn't mean that it really makes sense.
However, in this case, you may ask your question as a "what made the cause of the Universe so constrained?"
"Why does the sun set in the west?" is a perfectly valid inquiry into the mechanics of the solar system. 'Why' does not have to infer purpose.