RE: The Testimony of Nathan
August 28, 2018 at 8:21 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2018 at 8:34 pm by Caligvla XXI.)
(August 28, 2018 at 4:26 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Sure, if it meant "debunking" their theological, ideological, or political rivals. Similarly, when do you think christians got super prude, the eleventh century, the first century....or the sixteenth century?
So Christians would make up a story about a Jew debunking the miracles and resurrection of Jesus in order to debunk the Jews? And what Christians in any century would have made up a story about Jesus being manually aroused and fellated by a "courtesan" as he hung on the cross?
(August 28, 2018 at 6:53 pm)Jehanne Wrote: maybe it's a sham
The translator states that it could be either a modern forgery or an eleventh century forgery; tests have yet to be done on the actual manuscript to ascertain its age. He admits that for it to be a copy of a first century exemplar would be the most remote possibility.
(August 28, 2018 at 6:59 pm)Brian37 Wrote: nor can a human being survive rigor mortis after having all the blood drained out of their body and being dead for days
No shit?
