(September 12, 2018 at 9:49 pm)negatio Wrote: Insistently address one via insult Kelso. Rule/law, same difference Losty. It does not matter what we call whaaat the owners are saying, for, they are saying NO insult on the forum. Members are now so spoiled by lenience regarding their methodology of insult that, members absolutely refuse to obey forum law against insult...members, incapable of anything than insult cannot civilly, rationally discuss OP, they can only insult the OP and, cannot in fact posit a rational anti-thesis. I was pursuing a dialogical dialectical examination of my argument against Deity, when, all I get, is insult; dialogical dialectic does not, cannot proceed by insult; members only capable of enunciating insult and mere opinion; Vulcanlogician, a rational person will not visit this thread for all the ugly insultative interpersonal interaction transpiring herein.
Yes, Kelso, stick to insults presented via pure assertion, which constitute the very lowest form of human thinking, I. e. mere opinion. Keep your goddamn mere non-professional opinions regarding my psychological structure to yourself. I have gone to court employing my language; they thought I was nuts; was referred for certification by a psychologist; was determined to be a theoretically oriented, optimistic, sensitive person in possession of a superior IQ in the variable range; the court shut the fuck up on the question of my mentality, complimented me for passing their test with flying colors, and, the proceedings continued. I am a certified superior intelligence. San Jose, CA Superior Court circa 1980...
Did you not read what Jorm said? The following disclaimer is at the very top of the rules page... which you can access HERE (if it's so much trouble to click all the way over there in the top right hand corner of the screen
)... before any other rules are even defined:Rules Wrote:Atheist Forums (hereafter also referred to as "the website", "the site", "the forums", "atheistforums.org") reserves the right to enforce the following rules on its membership according to staff interpretation. This disclaimer is put in place to allow the spirit of the rules to trump any literal interpretation of the rules. The wording of these rules is chosen to decrease the number of misinterpretations, however they do arise and the final determination on how to interpret these rules is left to the staff. Nonetheless, discussion of potential changes to these rules is always welcomed and encouraged.
my bold
Guess they saw you coming with this... but what do you say to it?
