Seems as though you're confusing urban dictionary for the thesaurus.

I think we broke negatio.

(September 12, 2018 at 7:53 pm)Kit Wrote: Seems as though you're confusing urban dictionary for the thesaurus.

I think we broke negatio.

He showed up broken. We just pointed out all of the cracks.

So remember when I asked if he was basically unstable?

Someone pick up that phone, because I called it.

---

In all seriousness OP, and in the spirit of what compassion I can manage for you, seek help. Seriously. Whether that help boils down to reading comprehension or actual mental health help, try and get some assistance man.

(September 12, 2018 at 7:52 pm)negatio Wrote: radically fallacious argument by extension shit on carpet indeed...shit on duane for shiggles for weeks... when we first met you demanded simplicity...now you intentionally demand and create complexity when  I have given you simplicity...I say mediate/arbitrate sentence three..i am correct...sentence 3 is primal forum law...just trying to spread sen. 3 around clumsily...now %50....going down fast...snowballing injustice...erase thread asap to wipe evidence...fuck fucking duane...he heap big troll...whateverist refer to staff you do not take care of shit...My problem is, up to this very moment,  that ignorance insists on handling the situation wherein ignorance is absolutely sure I am a troll; your goddamn law instructs you to refer the question to staff; staff joins in on insulting duane...oh you are a troll...every fucking stranger around here is a troll for member/staff troll mentality...Neither the membership nor staff were or are cognizant of the introductory primal forum law...duane is being constituted a troll, via insult, against forum law... He is going down fast via accusations absent a fair hearing; how can members and staff be so stupid thinking since they are private they cannot tort duane ! ? Cease and desist slandering duane viia a paranoid schizophrenic delusion that is a troll...piss me off and I'll play real hardball; it does not matter if I am finally banned for exhibiting total disrespect for your corrupt staff...do not continue to tort duane...he does not even think it worthwhile to pursue the dream of having a rational interchange with rational ordinary reasonable men...Duane has fallen into a nest of troll-obsessed paranoid schizophrenics who put him into a schizophrenogenic double bind with systematically misleading doublespeak...bigtime lawsuit for tort...turn civil; obey forum law against insult within any sector of the forum whatsoever...if members cannot see that the ownership will tolerate some insult, when really they do not in fact wish to tolerate insult at all, and in sentence 3,  have said precisely so NO INSULT anywhere on forum, that is the law !

It rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the hose again.

Exactly.  Creepy x10.

(September 12, 2018 at 7:52 pm)negatio Wrote: radically fallacious argument by extension shit on carpet indeed...shit on duane for shiggles for weeks... when we first met you demanded simplicity...now you intentionally demand and create complexity when  I have given you simplicity...I say mediate/arbitrate sentence three..i am correct...sentence 3 is primal forum law...just trying to spread sen. 3 around clumsily...now %50....going down fast...snowballing injustice...erase thread asap to wipe evidence...fuck fucking duane...he heap big troll...whateverist refer to staff you do not take care of shit...My problem is, up to this very moment,  that ignorance insists on handling the situation wherein ignorance is absolutely sure I am a troll; your goddamn law instructs you to refer the question to staff; staff joins in on insulting duane...oh you are a troll...every fucking stranger around here is a troll for member/staff troll mentality...Neither the membership nor staff were or are cognizant of the introductory primal forum law...duane is being constituted a troll, via insult, against forum law... He is going down fast via accusations absent a fair hearing; how can members and staff be so stupid thinking since they are private they cannot tort duane ! ? Cease and desist slandering duane viia a paranoid schizophrenic delusion that is a troll...piss me off and I'll play real hardball; it does not matter if I am finally banned for exhibiting total disrespect for your corrupt staff...do not continue to tort duane...he does not even think it worthwhile to pursue the dream of having a rational interchange with rational ordinary reasonable men...Duane has fallen into a nest of troll-obsessed paranoid schizophrenics who put him into a schizophrenogenic double bind with systematically misleading doublespeak...bigtime lawsuit for tort...turn civil; obey forum law against insult within any sector of the forum whatsoever...if members cannot see that the ownership will tolerate some insult, when really they do not in fact wish to tolerate insult at all, and in sentence 3,  have said precisely so NO INSULT anywhere on forum, that is the law !

There are no laws here. Just rules. Rules which are interpreted and enforced by staff. Regardless of how you feel about it. You keep insisting you’re not a troll but all you post is crap like this. If you’re not a troll stop going on about the rule, and talk about your OP. Maybe participate in other threads. Comment your opinion. There are plenty of philosophy threads available if that’s the only thing you’re interested in.

Insistently address one via insult Kelso. Rule/law, same difference Losty. It does not matter what we call whaaat the owners are saying, for, they are saying NO insult on the forum. Members are now so spoiled by lenience regarding their methodology of insult that, members absolutely refuse to obey forum law against insult...members, incapable of anything than insult cannot civilly, rationally discuss OP, they can only insult the OP and, cannot in fact posit a rational anti-thesis. I was pursuing a dialogical dialectical examination of my argument against Deity, when, all I get, is insult; dialogical dialectic does not, cannot proceed by insult; members only capable of enunciating insult and mere opinion; Vulcanlogician, a rational person will not visit this thread for all the ugly insultative interpersonal interaction transpiring herein.

Yes, Kelso, stick to insults presented via pure assertion, which constitute the very lowest form of human thinking, I. e. mere opinion. Keep your goddamn mere non-professional opinions regarding my psychological structure to yourself. I have gone to court employing my language; they thought I was nuts; was referred for certification by a psychologist; was determined to be a theoretically oriented, optimistic, sensitive person in possession of a superior IQ in the variable range; the court shut the fuck up on the question of my mentality, complimented me for passing their test with flying colors, and, the proceedings continued. I am a certified superior intelligence. San Jose, CA Superior Court circa 1980. Check it out, bigmouth big shot Kelso. Contact the Superior court. My full name is Duane Clinton Meehan; dob o6/08/1945; Caucasian; 6' tall; 175 pounds; scar lower left quadrant of back; no tattoos.

(September 12, 2018 at 9:48 pm)Losty Wrote: There are no laws here. Just rules. Rules which are interpreted and enforced by staff. Regardless of how you feel about it. You keep insisting you’re not a troll but all you post is crap like this. If you’re not a troll stop going on about the rule, and talk about your OP. Maybe participate in other threads. Comment your opinion. There are plenty of philosophy threads available if that’s the only thing you’re interested in.

(September 12, 2018 at 9:49 pm)negatio Wrote: Insistently address one via insult Kelso.  Rule/law, same difference Losty.

Hold up...you’re allowed to use rule and law interchangeably, but you cannot understand that reply and quote are the same thing? Ok, Mr. doublespeak

(September 12, 2018 at 9:49 pm)negatio Wrote: Insistently address one via insult Kelso.  Rule/law, same difference Losty.  It does not matter what we call whaaat the owners are saying, for, they are saying NO insult on the forum.  Members are now so spoiled by lenience regarding their methodology of insult that, members absolutely refuse to obey forum law against insult...members, incapable of anything than insult cannot civilly, rationally discuss OP, they can only insult the OP and, cannot in fact posit a rational anti-thesis.  I was pursuing a dialogical dialectical examination of my argument against Deity, when, all I get, is insult; dialogical dialectic does not, cannot proceed by insult; members only capable of enunciating insult and mere opinion; Vulcanlogician, a rational person will not visit this thread for all the ugly insultative interpersonal interaction transpiring herein.

Yes, Kelso, stick to insults presented via pure assertion, which constitute the very lowest form of human thinking, I. e.  mere opinion.  Keep your goddamn mere non-professional opinions regarding my psychological structure to yourself.  I have gone to court employing my language; they thought I was nuts; was referred for certification by a psychologist; was determined to be a theoretically oriented, optimistic, sensitive person in possession of a superior IQ in the variable range; the  court shut the fuck up on the question of my mentality, complimented me for passing their test with flying colors, and, the proceedings continued.  I am a certified superior intelligence.  San Jose, CA Superior Court circa 1980...

Did you not read what Jorm said? The following disclaimer is at the very top of the rules page... which you can access HERE (if it's so much trouble to click all the way over there in the top right hand corner of the screen )... before any other rules are even defined:

Rules Wrote:Atheist Forums (hereafter also referred to as "the website", "the site", "the forums", "atheistforums.org") reserves the right to enforce the following rules on its membership according to staff interpretation. This disclaimer is put in place to allow the spirit of the rules to trump any literal interpretation of the rules. The wording of these rules is chosen to decrease the number of misinterpretations, however they do arise and the final determination on how to interpret these rules is left to the staff. Nonetheless, discussion of potential changes to these rules is always welcomed and encouraged.

my bold

Guess they saw you coming with this... but what do you say to it?