I really doubt that I'd give a shit one way or the other.
Right now, the "evidence" for a Gospel Jesus is non existent. The evidence for a Historical Jesus is mainly wishful thinking. The evidence for a Mythic Jesus is compelling.
A historical jesus merely means some shlub who was wandering around Judaea annoying people until he got himself killed. If there was such a person it really does not matter. If someone comes up with evidence for a Gospel Jesus - you know a miracle working fuck who really came back from the dead and then flew up to heaven - that would be something but that really is a bridge too far unless you are a fundie asshole who already thinks it is real.
Right now, the "evidence" for a Gospel Jesus is non existent. The evidence for a Historical Jesus is mainly wishful thinking. The evidence for a Mythic Jesus is compelling.
A historical jesus merely means some shlub who was wandering around Judaea annoying people until he got himself killed. If there was such a person it really does not matter. If someone comes up with evidence for a Gospel Jesus - you know a miracle working fuck who really came back from the dead and then flew up to heaven - that would be something but that really is a bridge too far unless you are a fundie asshole who already thinks it is real.
