From the procedural standpoint, this trial is frivolous as it was the local officials who gave the all-clear signal before the quake struck.
As such, they're responsible. Unless, of course, the weatherman can indeed be held liable for predicting the future. Which boggles the mind how such a legal contortion can exist.
As such, they're responsible. Unless, of course, the weatherman can indeed be held liable for predicting the future. Which boggles the mind how such a legal contortion can exist.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
