(September 26, 2018 at 3:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 26, 2018 at 1:57 am)Minimalist Wrote: Yeah - his lawyer said the same stupid shit. Gee. Even the jury didn't believe his fucking lawyer.
But you, Huggy, are easily impressed by tall tales. Hence your devotion to that sick bible shit.
Wrong you fool, that evidence wasnt allowed to be presented, the fix was in...
Again
Quote:Yet Judge Steven O’Neill blocked the lawyers from introducing the tales of drug use, greed, racism that included a deep hatred for African-Americans — a hatred so deep and dark he claims Andrea’s mother, Gianna Constand, wanted to “see all niggers gathered together and killed.” However, Judge O’Neill wouldn’t allow it after prosecutors argued it would taint the jurors perspective on who the Constand’s were so much that it could poison their minds and likely change the outcome.
(September 26, 2018 at 3:17 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: And what about OJ, Huggy? Was he also innocent?
Not falling for your attempt at derailing the thread, all you have to do is go to YouTube and look up the video of Mark Fuhrman pleading the 5th in regards to planting evidence, and use your brain.
But its interesting that even if one 8s acquitted their still guilty in your mind.
Damned if you do and damned if you dont...
(September 26, 2018 at 1:48 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many...e&ie=UTF-8
He wasn't on trial for those women, this trial involved one, possibly two women, although I believe the second woman was just giving testimony.
The testimony of both women was contradictory...
It doesn't matter to me which woman specifically he was on trial for. What matter more is overall justice.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)