No YOU'RE shitting the bed. 
I've thought about this. If you are out to do genocide, any gaggle of goons will do.
What is a "goon" anyway? Perhaps a good working definition of a goon is someone who just does what they are asked, gets paid, and then moves on without reflecting too much on what was done. Why does capitalism continue to work? Meh. There's a lot of goons out there.
You wanna talk about goons. I wanna talk about capitalism. Let's return to the original point: theists on the forum.
I say good. It's good that theists are here. To me, they are like mushrooms in the forest. By-and-large, they are just there. Some are eyesores. Others contribute to the overall aesthetic. But some of them... some of them will take you on a journey you never imagined (if you sit down and take a bite).
I feel like you thinking that the forum should be without theists is similar to someone thinking a forest should be without mushrooms. It's absurd on the face of it. An ecologist would come in and state that (if this was done) the forest would become lifeless. And, just because you are anti-mushroom, you would rather the forest be without mushrooms--even the beautiful ones, even the ones that can take you on journeys.
My suggesting Twatter to you was basically this: if you so despise the forest, why not walk on the plain?
I've thought about this. If you are out to do genocide, any gaggle of goons will do.
What is a "goon" anyway? Perhaps a good working definition of a goon is someone who just does what they are asked, gets paid, and then moves on without reflecting too much on what was done. Why does capitalism continue to work? Meh. There's a lot of goons out there.
You wanna talk about goons. I wanna talk about capitalism. Let's return to the original point: theists on the forum.
I say good. It's good that theists are here. To me, they are like mushrooms in the forest. By-and-large, they are just there. Some are eyesores. Others contribute to the overall aesthetic. But some of them... some of them will take you on a journey you never imagined (if you sit down and take a bite).
I feel like you thinking that the forum should be without theists is similar to someone thinking a forest should be without mushrooms. It's absurd on the face of it. An ecologist would come in and state that (if this was done) the forest would become lifeless. And, just because you are anti-mushroom, you would rather the forest be without mushrooms--even the beautiful ones, even the ones that can take you on journeys.
My suggesting Twatter to you was basically this: if you so despise the forest, why not walk on the plain?
